Why We Ditched DMSO: A Look at the Safety of Dimethyl Sulfoxide

on 08.15.2017 / by Daniel Thrasher / 1 comment in Bio101, Research

Early in the summer of 2017, I traveled to Europe to explore the Scottish Highlands. With rolling hills and an ethereal mist hanging in the air, the Highlands are easily among the most beautiful landscapes in the world.

DMSO is like the Scotland landscape

But even though I loved visiting the Highlands, I couldn’t imagine actually living there.

Why? Because there’s a flip side to such natural beauty: it has to rain nearly every day to support that amount of greenery.    

And not just a light drizzle.

I’m talking about heavy, fierce rain that can turn a pleasant afternoon hike into a jaunt through a hurricane in about five minutes flat.

It quickly occurred to me that the natural beauty of the Highlands was a double edged sword. The benefit of breathtaking scenery was overshadowed, quite literally, by nearly perpetual dark clouds and rain.

The DMSO Double Edged Sword

At Burst Biologics, we see a lot of double edged swords throughout science and medicine: Drugs can treat all kinds of conditions, but they also cause potential side effects. Surgeries carry the risk of possible complications, even as they give patients a new lease on life. Ultimately, it’s hard to get the good without a risk of the bad.

That’s probably why, in the world of regenerative medicine, it’s widely accepted that the cryoprotective agent (CPA) known as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a necessary evil for cryopreserving graft sources prior to infusion in patients.

Many physicians simply accept DMSO as the “bad edge” of a double edged sword, with the “good edge” being the many benefits that patients enjoy with stem cell transplantation.

But this chemical can be more dangerous than doctors give it credit for.

A Brief History of DMSO

Dimethyl sulfoxide is a colorless liquid discovered in 19th century Germany as a byproduct of wood pulp when producing paper. One of its most notable properties is its ability to permeate across cell membranes. This quickly proved useful for dermatological conditions like skin inflammation or scleroderma.

DMSO is a byproduct of paper production

The year 1959 marked the first trial of DMSO usage to prevent freezing damage to living cells. Later, in 1978, DMSO received FDA approval for treating interstitial cystitis (aka chronic bladder pain).

However, all these decades later in 2017, the chemical is still only approved by the FDA for that single function. There have been rumblings about DMSO’s possible use in cancer treatment as well, but according to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, there are still lingering concerns over potential toxicities in DMSO. These concerns should – and do – spill over into DMSO’s use as a cryoprotectant.

Cell Preserver or Cell Killer?

On the positive side, DMSO has the ability to permeate across cell membranes, allowing it to inhibit intracellular ice formation and prevent injury in stem cell freezing. It’s also soluble in both aqueous and organic media, making it extremely useful both in the lab and in clinical applications.

But even with all these great properties, DMSO has its drawbacks. The chemical is associated with possible toxicity and a range of serious side effects, and we also know that prolonged exposure to dimethyl sulfoxide directly impacts cellular function and growth.

In fact, one of our molecular biologists explained that she uses DMSO to preserve cell lines for research, but once she’s done thawing cells, she gets rid of the DMSO as soon as possible. She’s learned from experience how quickly it kills her research cells. The same effect can occur in a clinical setting: once cells begin to thaw, they are susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of dimethyl sulfoxide.

So, with all this in mind, how exactly does this chemical affect patients in the real world?

Adverse Reactions From DMSO

As common as DMSO is as a cryoprotectant agent, there’s still a significant number of potential side effects and adverse reactions associated with the chemical. That’s why we made it a priority to completely eliminate DMSO from our products.

Here’s a brief look at the many adverse reactions (ARs) recorded after transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells in patients, as compiled in the study “Hematopoietic SCT with cryopreserved grafts” by Z Shu, S Heimfeld, and D Gao.

Types of ARs from DMSO:

  • Allergy. DMSO can induce a release of histamine. Common allergic reactions include flushing, rash, and edema.
  • Gastrointestinal. Affecting the limbic-hypothalamic pathways, DMSO can result in symptoms like nausea, abdominal pain, and emesis.
  • Renal. The incidence of kidney-related ARs is comparatively low, but includes symptoms like hemoglobinuria, proteinuria, and urine incontinence.
  • Cardiovascular. Symptoms include hypertension, arrhythmias, tachycardia, shock, cardiac arrest, and seizure.
  • Neurological. Symptoms include bilateral thalamic infarction, blurred vision, severe encephalopathy, cognition, muscle weakness, and numbness.
  • Hepatic. Symptoms include progressive jaundice.

As serious as these conditions are, this is only a partial list of the identified ARs related to DMSO, based on many studies centered around the physiological role of the chemical in ARs, from neurotoxic reactions to shock.

Studies also show that the adverse effects are cumulative. Patients receiving multi-dose therapies containing DMSO may suffer progressively more severe symptoms over time.

Even more worrisome, the scientific community doesn’t actually have a lot of data to suggest what effects the chemical may have on patients long-term. That’s why it’s problematic to inject people with the chemical – in the long run, we have no idea what may happen.

Now, to be fair, not all adverse reactions (ARs) are solely attributable to DMSO itself. In any allograft or stem cell transplantation procedure, there are many components involved. Some of these factors, such as dead cell debris after thaw or the low temperature of infused products, can also lead to ARs.

But much of the concern does lie with DMSO itself, as illuminated by a documented causal relationship between DMSO and adverse reactions. That’s why there’s been a concerted effort in the industry to remove or reduce DMSO from cryopreserved products.

What to do About DMSO

If we know that DMSO has the potential to be harmful to patients, the next question is, what do we do with that information? After all, cryopreservation is still a necessity if we want patients to enjoy the benefits of allografts and stem cell transplantation.

Well, you can deal with this problem in a few ways. One of the most common is DMSO removal through centrifugation right before delivery to the patient.

3D Model of DMSO Molecule

This is certainly a positive for many patients, but it still doesn’t fully resolve the problem. Aside from adding extra steps to the transplantation process, spinning down the product in a centrifuge still leaves trace amounts of DMSO, enough to trigger an AR in those who are sensitive to the chemical.

Plus, in the time it takes to thaw, spin, and resuspend the product, there’s also ample opportunity for cell death.

So, what else can be done? Here are four other widely discussed strategies for minimizing adverse reactions to dimethyl sulfoxide in cryopreserved grafts:

  • Reducing overall DMSO concentration
  • Administering medication before and after transplantation
  • Optimizing the infusion procedure
  • Using alternative CPAs for cryopreservation

The first three solutions hold some promise, but the bottom line is, nothing is safer than simply avoiding DMSO altogether.

A True DMSO Alternative

At Burst Biologics, we chose the fourth option: adopting a non-toxic DMSO alternative for cryopreservation in our BioBurst cellular allograft products. We developed the Progenokine Process to preserve product integrity and address the potentially harmful agent of DMSO in our cryopreservation media.

Our own lab research has demonstrated the efficacy of this DMSO-free stem cell cryopreservation medium, which enlists USP grade non-toxic ingredients. Ultimately, the products do their job well without even a hint of dimethyl sulfoxide.

In finding a quality DMSO alternative for our BioBurst products, Burst Biologics has taken a major step forward in improving the safety of regenerative medicine. While there’s still work to do, we’re proud to be moving forward on innovative new solutions that help people live healthier, more fulfilling lives.


  1. Hematopoietic SCT with cryopreserved grafts: adverse reactions after transplantation and cryoprotectant removal before infusion
  2. Dimethyl Sulfoxide-Induced Toxicity in Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature
  3. Clinical Toxicity of Cryopreserved Bone Marrow Graft Infusion
Share this post by clicking on an icon >Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

One comment on “Why We Ditched DMSO: A Look at the Safety of Dimethyl Sulfoxide

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Please enter all required information below!

Become a Distributor
With unique products, prompt field support and product specialists available to answer your physician's questions.


Corporate Office
3501 Elder St. Ste #104
Boise, ID 83705